Monday, February 21, 2011

American Apparel Advertisement


In this image a young woman is leaned over a bowl of cereal, supposedly relaxing “the morning after”. One cannot help but notice the angle of the camera is conveniently placed to look up at her legs and bottom. For American Apparel (A.A.), a clothing company based in downtown Los Angeles, these types of provocative ads based on objectifying women’s bodies are not unusual. A.A. has been critiqued and scolded by numerous feminist based websites and organizations, mainly Jezebel.com, for printing overly sexual based advertisements. This ad in particular is overtly sexist in displaying a half naked female, in the kitchen, with the only part of her on display that will apparently grab the attention of the audience. It is clear this model has been selected based on the modern American beauty ideal: she has blonde, shoulder length hair, she is fairly skinny (probably a size 0/2) with a little extra (seemingly) on the hips and in the buttocks, not to mention she’s half naked and in the kitchen-where a misogynist might say she “belongs”. The most overtly sexist part of this advertisement is that her face is not shown because clearly her face is not what is going to sell A.A. clothing.
The text on the bottom says “Los Angeles. The morning after. Trying to put it back together.” The explicit meaning of this text is describing the context of the image: location – Los Angeles; date/time- the morning after (sex, most likely); action – trying to put “it” back together. Although it is not overtly clear what “it” entails, one could assume a number of things. Personally I would take that phrase as a reference to the date that this woman had last night was such an extravagant lover that he completely turned her world upside down and the only way she can “put it back together” would be to revert to comfortable routines like standing up half naked in the kitchen making herself the same bowl of cereal she has probably enjoyed since she was a child. However, the ad is clearly not trying to sell the cereal but instead how “hot” their underwear will make you look even at a time when your world is in shambles.
This advertisement places an extraordinary value on the female body as a tool, or object, used to sell clothing, considering she is the main and only prominent figure in the photograph. Our society values the half naked female form incredibly and scrutinizes it regularly until the concept of perfection loses all aesthetic meaning because it can never be reached. Generally speaking, men want to have sex with women who look like this and women want to look like this because the beauty ideal is revered and is perpetuated in popular music, commercial advertisements, actresses on television and in movies, and models on the pages of most popular magazines. If we look at society as a whole and how these ads perpetuate the way some men see women –as objects- these ads in no way help bring violence rates down and by no means appeal to the reasoning that women are people, not commodities.

3 comments:

  1. Wow, I really enjoyed reading your response to this ad, it was really well thought up and made a lot of sense when I actually analyzed it from your perspective. The woman does definitely fit the standards, white, blond, body shape, etc, but I wish we could have seen her face better. I know that defeats the purpose being that the camera is angled at her rear end to heighten sexual appeal, but it would have been nice to see her face to see if we see any beauty norms with that as well.

    I understand what you are saying in regards to women want to look like her and men want to have sex with women that look like her, but I am totally disgusted with this way of thinking. What about you?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Farrah, I have to agree with the discontent you feel about objectifying women on the basis of sexual desire. In our society there are a lot of body conscious females and males, and ads like these that show the ideal instead of a natural female figure, un-airbrushed and un-retouched, just breeds further insecurities. It also creates a stigma for which men to judge women on and for women to further judge each other, purely from the standpoint that this one girl, or the severely skinny and altered women of the fashion industry are the perfect prototype when in actuality most are unhealthy and needless to say impossible to match. So wouldn't we rather want to endorse advertisements that reinforce a healthy self-image campaign rather than one based mostly on whether the ad can facilitate an erection?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alexa,
    You do an effective job of tying your advertisement into the beauty ideal and to how the beauty ideal is often used in advertisements to sell a concept of womanhood and thereby clothes. Despite this connection to course ideas, you needed to use textual analysis and cite your texts.

    ReplyDelete