Sunday, February 27, 2011

Business of Being Born vs. One Born Every Minute

       
         While watching both “The Business of Being Born” and “One Born Every Minute” I noticed some immediate similarities in the attitudes of the mothers. In both instances, home births and hospital births, the mothers seem to be anticipating the labor and not completely knowing what to expect. The fathers initially seem less sympathetic at the hospital in “One Born Every Minute”.  The fathers were more interested in their own discomfort it seemed during the hospital birthing whereas in home birthing the fathers were more concerned with connecting with their partners and being an active part of the experience. I’m not quite sure whether it is a product of “show business” or whether the majority of hospital births are this dramatic, but it seems there are a lot more issues being displayed and complications during “One Born Every Minute”. However, in “The Business of Being Born” the home birthing was displayed as a serene and spiritual experience that had a fairly large success rate in the movie at least, which drastically differentiates it from the complex and dramatic hospital births in “One Born Every Minute”.
                In the show “One Born Every Minute”, birthing is seen as a process that is arduous and painful and somehow less emotionally enriching as it had been portrayed in “Business of Being Born”. One could definitely make the connections about a hospital being an industry just like any other one of the mothers arrives for a scheduled C-Section, her second C-Section to be accurate. It turns out that her first C-Section was due to “non-progression”, which can either mean the baby was not progressing and was considered to becoming “high-risk” or that the baby was not progressing as fast as the doctors would have liked, considering an average labor is supposed to be about 24 hours but the average hospital labor is around 8. Also, as seen in “The Business of Being Born” the mothers were allowed to move around and adjust their bodies with the contractions while the mothers in the hospital in “One Born Every Minute” were restricted to bed and were discussing pain medications and pitocin, which is a drug to speed up labor. One perfect example of the reverence of medicine over alternatives to alleviate pain was Carissa called the anesthesiologist “God” because he would take away her pain, pain probably intensified by the pitocin and her position laying flat on the bed.
                In “One Born Every Minute”, as opposed to the construction of the beauty of home birthing in “The Business of Being Born”, the doctors and nurses ran the show and hardly let the mothers’ bodies be in charge of their own labor. The most knowledgeable (doctors/nurses) were revered over the experience itself, when in actuality they have no investment or commitment to their patients. And like I mentioned earlier, childbirth was feared as an unrelenting difficult task that added pain and discomfort as a means to an end, while during home birthing labor was a special experience shared by the mother and her partner to connect with the child.

Monday, February 21, 2011

American Apparel Advertisement


In this image a young woman is leaned over a bowl of cereal, supposedly relaxing “the morning after”. One cannot help but notice the angle of the camera is conveniently placed to look up at her legs and bottom. For American Apparel (A.A.), a clothing company based in downtown Los Angeles, these types of provocative ads based on objectifying women’s bodies are not unusual. A.A. has been critiqued and scolded by numerous feminist based websites and organizations, mainly Jezebel.com, for printing overly sexual based advertisements. This ad in particular is overtly sexist in displaying a half naked female, in the kitchen, with the only part of her on display that will apparently grab the attention of the audience. It is clear this model has been selected based on the modern American beauty ideal: she has blonde, shoulder length hair, she is fairly skinny (probably a size 0/2) with a little extra (seemingly) on the hips and in the buttocks, not to mention she’s half naked and in the kitchen-where a misogynist might say she “belongs”. The most overtly sexist part of this advertisement is that her face is not shown because clearly her face is not what is going to sell A.A. clothing.
The text on the bottom says “Los Angeles. The morning after. Trying to put it back together.” The explicit meaning of this text is describing the context of the image: location – Los Angeles; date/time- the morning after (sex, most likely); action – trying to put “it” back together. Although it is not overtly clear what “it” entails, one could assume a number of things. Personally I would take that phrase as a reference to the date that this woman had last night was such an extravagant lover that he completely turned her world upside down and the only way she can “put it back together” would be to revert to comfortable routines like standing up half naked in the kitchen making herself the same bowl of cereal she has probably enjoyed since she was a child. However, the ad is clearly not trying to sell the cereal but instead how “hot” their underwear will make you look even at a time when your world is in shambles.
This advertisement places an extraordinary value on the female body as a tool, or object, used to sell clothing, considering she is the main and only prominent figure in the photograph. Our society values the half naked female form incredibly and scrutinizes it regularly until the concept of perfection loses all aesthetic meaning because it can never be reached. Generally speaking, men want to have sex with women who look like this and women want to look like this because the beauty ideal is revered and is perpetuated in popular music, commercial advertisements, actresses on television and in movies, and models on the pages of most popular magazines. If we look at society as a whole and how these ads perpetuate the way some men see women –as objects- these ads in no way help bring violence rates down and by no means appeal to the reasoning that women are people, not commodities.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Service Learning Proposal

Service Learning Proposal for NOW
By: Melissa Colon, Caitlin Costa, Alexa Nelen
February 10th, 2011
Alexa Nelen
WST 3015-0001

Community Partner Profile:

NOW UCF Campus Action Network

Kelly Thibert (President): k.thibert@gmail.com
Kelly Quintero (Vice President): kquintero@knights.ucf.edu

Mission Statement: NOW is a progressive organization dedicated to making legal, political, social and economic change in our society in order to achieve our goal, which is to eliminate sexism and end all oppression (NOW.org).

Key semester goals: Becoming more visible on campus and within the community, raising awareness about issues, more tabling, and to show the community WHO is a NOW member and WHAT is feminism.

NOW was established on June 30, 1966 in Washington, D.C., by those attending the Third National Conference of the Commission on the Status of Women. Among NOW's 28 founders was its first president, Betty Friedan, author of The Feminine Mystique (NOW.org).

In order to achieve the above goals, UCF’s NOW chapter is seeking not only funding but also “people power” to fully realize their mission statement on a community level.

The Proposal:

Most of NOW’s issues involve women’s rights and abortion laws, bringing awareness to the problem of domestic violence and rape, and equality among men and women in the work place and the community. In order to bring positive and progressive change in favor of both women and men, contributions and involvement by the community are crucial.

One dominant part of NOW’s goals is to bring awareness to the community and nation as to what being a feminist means and what feminists ideals can bring to movements aimed at evoking progressive thinking and change. In order to accomplish this, it is imperative that NOW UCF contributes to better establishing a working definition of feminism that will invite the community in and will not scare potential involvement away.

NOW aims to change these constructions and give more flexibility to women personally and in their communities by making large scale changes. In order to do this, NOW UCF needs, more than anything, the voice to call out to the UCF community to recruit people to help make these changes.

Plan Proposal:

In order to achieve more awareness for NOW around campus and in the community, and in order to help people in the community realize the power of feminism and what being a feminist means, we will be doing several different things for our Service Learning. All of the projects will bring awareness of NOW as a legitimate and progressive organization at UCF as well as attempt to persuade people in the community to join in and contribute. The most vital part of any movement is publicity and “people power”. Hopefully with the below contributions both of these components can be fulfilled.

A modern feminist is seen as someone to be suspicious of and most are hesitant to be labeled as such. Having an organization like NOW contribute to changing this stereotype will add to the progression of social movements that bring equality to women.

 Firstly, the most seemingly affective way to bring attention to NOW in the UCF community is to first set up a table at least once a week outside of the Student Union and advertise meeting times, set up an email list for information on events and meetings, bring attention to NOW UCF’s Facebook page and finally to clearly dictate NOW’s goals and the goals of many feminists to UCF students and faculty. Secondly, we plan to make and distribute NOW posters that would advertise dates and times of various events around campus and Orlando and meeting dates and times. Considering NOW UCF needs both funding and “people power” in order to achieve its goals, these two ideas would be incredibly affective in bringing these goals to fruition.

In order to contribute to the “people power” needed by NOW UCF, we will participate in planning events with NOW like an event for Feminist Coming Out Day. The tentative plan for an event like this would be to first set up a table outside of the Student Union in order to advertise the event at least a week prior. Then have the three of us and some other members located around campus and ask students if they consider themselves a feminist. If they say yes they will collect a ribbon, a sticker or some badge that will demonstrate their decision to “come out” as a feminist. The goal is to bring awareness to the day and the importance of feminist ideals. By wearing a badge like this, hopefully one’s friends or classmates will ask about it and that would spread the word of Feminist Coming Out Day orally and simultaneously bring attention to the amount of people that may share one’s ideals and have similar views about issues presented by NOW. By giving the proclaimed feminists a physical identifier, it would make others with the same ideals more comfortable with the idea if they knew their friends or peers felt the same, considering the “F” word is something that is skirted around most of the time. Lastly, the entire thing would be one big advertisement for NOW and hopefully recruit new members that have found their voice by “coming out” as a feminist, or one with feminist ideals.

Rationale:

NOW is a progressive organization that has continued to strive for a change in socially constructed gender roles. As Judith Lorber said, “everyone ‘does gender’ without thinking about it” because these roles are so inscribed in our daily lives and how we are raised (Kirk and Okazawa-Rey, 64). Most young girls and women are complacent in their rigid gender roles and do not know any alternative. By bringing awareness to programs and institutions like NOW, the goal is this complacency will turn into contemplation and change.

All women should be educated and encouraged to define themselves by what makes them happy. NOW helps women do just this; by encouraging progression and development of gender equality in social, political, personal and economic practices. Lorber further states “gender is one of the major ways people identify themselves”, and it is important to help create positive and equal gender roles (Kirk and Okazawa-Rey, 65). Re-inscribing these roles however can be intimidating considering they are such a natural part of our lives. But in order to make progress, it is imperative to denaturalize and examine such constructions that have encroached on our inalienable right to equality.

Action:

I have met with both the President and Vice President of NOW at UCF along with the other members to discuss our tentative plans and goals for the semester. I will be attending meetings regularly and tabling in front of the Student Union to bring attention to NOW and its events. I will discuss further plans with the members of NOW to create a cohesive vision for carrying out NOW’s mission statement.

Timeline

We are working with the other members of NOW to increase visibility on campus so that we may raise awareness on key issues. The following dates are subject to minor changes. Tabling events in front of the union will occur no less frequently than on a bimonthly basis.
1.      Abortion Discussion Panel Hosted by the College Republicans- February 21
2.      Feminist Coming Out Day- March 2
3.      Green Waves Festival Interactive Tent- March 20
4.      Take Back the Night March and Rally- March 24

Works Cited

National Organization for Women (NOW). Web. 08 Feb. 2011. http://www.now.org/.
Kirk, Gwyn, and Margo Okazawa-Rey. Women’s Lives: Multicultural Perspectives 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007.
Word Count: 964